Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Discussion Topic: Easements, beneficial or lip service?
Conservation easements have been around since 1974, and have been widely popular with states, businesses, and large land owners. While their benefit to wildlife is fairly obvious (you cannot develop the land and local fish and wildlife agencies usually monitor the health of the habitat and wildlife populations), I can't help but wonder whenever I read about an easement if it's a company really trying to give back to hunting and fishing or if they're looking for a tax write-off and a way to prevent anyone from encroaching on their property.
Case in point, in an area near Smith Mountain Lake in Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains, Appalachian Power (AP) has just agreed to place nearly 5,000 acres in an easement. The tract of land will protect the
Smith Mountain Wildlife Area and still be open to hunting and fishing. It also happens to be adjacent to AP's hydroelectric dam. This is part of Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine's larger plan to have 400,000 acres of conservation easements in his state by 2010 (a little over 1 percent of the total land mass of Virginia).
So, do you think those involved in easements are in it for the wildlife, the money, or a little of both?
Labels: Discussion Topics